contentSlug

type

ContentSlug_ContentQuery

slug

ContentPageContentQuery

content

trendingContent

query ContentSlug_ContentQuery(
  $contentSlug: String!
  $type: [ContentType!]
) {
  ...ContentPageContentQuery_13QmVO
}

fragment CompanyDetails_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  companies {
    name
    description
    pageUrl
    id
  }
}

fragment ContentBasicInfo on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  id
  type
  title
  lang
  companies {
    viewerIsFollowing
    id
    name
    pageUrl
  }
  tags {
    viewerIsFollowing
    id
    name
    pageUrl
  }
  ...PublishingDetails
  ...Reactions
}

fragment ContentMetadata on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  type
  title
  lang
  pageUrl
  alternatePageUrls: translations {
    __typename
    pageUrl
    lang
  }
  imgUrl
  description
  ... on Video {
    liveTime
    videoUrl
  }
  ... on Webcast {
    liveTime
    videoUrl
  }
}

fragment ContentPageContentQuery_13QmVO on Query {
  content(slug: $contentSlug, type: $type) {
    __typename
    id
    type
    title
    isPremium
    lang
    htmlBody
    summary
    companies {
      forum {
        latestPosts {
          ...ForumPosts
        }
      }
      name
      id
      viewerIsFollowing
      pageUrl
      defaultInstrument {
        isin
        id
        marketOpen
        marketClose
        marketplace {
          region
        }
        returns {
          total
        }
      }
    }
    tags {
      viewerIsFollowing
      id
      name
      pageUrl
    }
    createdAt
    ... on Video {
      liveTime
    }
    ... on Webcast {
      liveTime
    }
    slug
    ... on CompanyReport {
      reportUrl
    }
    ... on ThirdPartyCompanyReport {
      reportUrl
    }
    ... on StockExchangeRelease {
      reportUrl
    }
    ...ContentBasicInfo
    ...ContentMetadata
    ...PriceAndRecommendation_Content
    ...CompanyDetails_Content
    ...ReportLink_Content
    ...KeyFigures_Content
  }
  ...TrendingContent_1jQ2Cn
}

fragment ForumPosts on ForumPost {
  text
  likesCount
  url
  author
  postedAt
  authorImgUrl
}

fragment KeyFigures_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  companies {
    defaultInstrument {
      estimateData {
        modelType
        reportingCurrency
      }
      snapshot {
        transaction {
          date
          actualized {
            year
            quarter
            revenue
            revenueGrowth
            ebitAdjusted
            ebitReported
            ebitda
            enterpriseValue
            epsAdjusted
            dividend
            dividendYield
            sharePrice
            nav
            navPerShare
            opexOfNav
            quarterlySharePrice
          }
          estimates {
            year
            quarter
            revenue
            revenueGrowth
            ebitAdjusted
            ebitReported
            ebitda
            enterpriseValue
            epsAdjusted
            dividend
            dividendYield
            sharePrice
            nav
            navPerShare
            opexOfNav
            quarterlySharePrice
          }
        }
      }
      id
    }
    id
  }
}

fragment PriceAndRecommendation_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  createdAt
  companies {
    name
    pageUrl
    defaultInstrument {
      priceData {
        tradeCurrency
      }
      snapshot {
        priceData {
          date
          lastPrice
          tradeCurrency
        }
        transaction {
          date
          recommendation
          targetPrice
        }
        prevTransaction {
          recommendation
        }
      }
      id
    }
    id
  }
}

fragment PublishingDetails on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  createdAt
  publishers {
    name
    imgUrl
  }
  authors {
    __typename
    id
    name
    slug
    imgUrl
    jobTitle
  }
  ... on Video {
    liveTime
  }
  ... on Webcast {
    liveTime
  }
}

fragment Reactions on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  id
  reactionGroups {
    reactionType
    reactionsCount
    viewerReacted
  }
}

fragment ReportLink_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  type
  isPremium
  ... on CompanyReport {
    reportUrl
  }
  ... on ThirdPartyCompanyReport {
    reportUrl
  }
  ... on StockExchangeRelease {
    reportUrl
  }
}

fragment TrendingContent_1jQ2Cn on Query {
  trendingContent(type: ARTICLE) {
    __typename
    id
    title
    lang
    pageUrl
    createdAt
    type
    imgUrl
    companies {
      squareLogoUrl
      name
      id
    }
    authors {
      __typename
      imgUrl
      id
    }
    publishers {
      imgUrl
    }
  }
}


purmo-to-end-up-with-grand-bidco-against-our-expectations

__typename

title

isPremium

lang

htmlBody

summary

companies

createdAt

publishers

authors

reactionGroups

pageUrl

translations

imgUrl

description

Analytiker

Arttu Heikura

Räntorna kom också (åtminstone hos Nordnet). De skulle hinna ackumuleras till 0,618529 €/aktie.

Pengarna från Purmo kom in på kontot idag, det vill säga 11,98€/aktie (enligt skiljedomen). Ränta syntes ännu inte i Nordnet, men enligt mina beräkningar borde det ackumuleras cirka 0,62€/aktie.

Ja, det är verkligen en mycket liten höjning, när man ser till de totala pengarna som använts för att köpa Purmo.  Roschiers fakturering är förmodligen också av den storleken att Bidco förmodligen inte vill ha fler fakturor från det hållet.  Om någon dock skulle klaga på detta, vem skulle då informera minoritetsaktieägarna om detta och skulle en förvaltare då också representera minoritetsaktieägarna?

Det är förstås möjligt, men man bör komma ihåg att det handlar om en höjning på 0.8 miljoner när det totala priset för köperbjudandet var vad, 500 miljoner. Och då tar man förstås risken att även minoritetsägare överklagar och att en högre instans bestämmer ett högre inlösenpris och dessutom rättegångskostnader. I Ahlstrom har man fortfarande processat efter köperbjudandet 2021, där var köparen inte lika förmögen som i Purmo och tvistesumman var mångdubbel.

En betydande höjning av inlösenpriset. Är det realistiskt att Bidco skulle överklaga denna dom?

Välitystuomio tuli tänään sähköpostilla aktiiviseksi ilmoittautuneille vähemmistöomistajille. Kahden viikon kuluessa tuomio rekisteröidään ja silloin se lienee julkisesti saatavilla.

Jaha, jag får väl kolla upp beslutet. Hade du någon länk där informationen finns? Med en snabb googling lyckades jag inte hitta det.

Purmo Group

Purmo announced that, based on preliminary results, more than 90% of its shareholders have accepted the tender offer made by the Grand Bidco consortium. Shortly before, Haier, a competing bidder and higher bidder than Grand Bidco, announced its withdrawal from the bidding war. 

Translation: Original comment published in Finnish on 8/1/2024 at 8:45 am EEST.
Purmo announced that, based on preliminary results, more than 90% of its shareholders have accepted the tender offer made by the Grand Bidco consortium. Shortly before, Haier, a competing bidder and higher bidder than Grand Bidco, announced its withdrawal from the bidding war. According to Haier, certain conditions of the offer were not met, as Purmo&apos;s two largest major owners and the company&apos;s board of directors supported Grand Bidco&apos;s offer despite Haier&apos;s higher offer price.&#xa0;
<h2>Based on preliminary results, Grand Bidco has received more than 90% of the shares</h2>
The offeror will announce the final result around August 2. However, based on the preliminary results, Purmo is about to end up with Grand Bidco, as it appears that shareholders representing 93.2% of the shares have accepted the offer or otherwise agreed to sell their shares to Grand Bidco. The promised consideration for the listed C-shares under the provisionally accepted offer is EUR 11.06, slightly higher than the last closing price (EUR 11.0).
We believed that Purmo would end up with Haier, which made a higher offer. In our view, the risk highlighted by Purmo&apos;s board that the Haier transaction would not be completed until 6 months later seemed much smaller than the additional return on the tender offer (23% higher compared to Grand Bidco). We therefore continue to question the board&apos;s decision to support Grand Bidco&apos;s offer, which made it difficult for Haier, which had shown a credible interest in Purmo, to proceed with its higher offer. We will update our views on Purmo in the coming days.

Purmo to end up with Grand Bidco, against our expectations

Based on preliminary results, Grand Bidco has received more than 90% of the shares

Forum uppdateringar